Tony Sidaway wrote:
I don't see exactly why Bard (or any other person) would be obligated to respond to every anonymous individual who e-mailed him on the internet demanding information, or how his response (or lack thereof) would be relevant to a well-cited reference.
Well if as I have done one has gone to the UN report on the UN website (which is probably incomplete because its author was assassinated by Jewish renegades very shortly after sending part of it)
Um, no, he signed it shorly before being assasinated, but there's no indication it was "incomplete" as of that date.
and failed to find the full text, and nevertheless found conflicting texts on (for instance) Avalon,
Which "conflicting texts" do think you've found?
it is absolutely imperative that the citation, which is ''de facto'' incorrect, either be remedied by the originator or omitted entirely.
"De facto incorrect" in what sense?
Be a good chap, remove your claim or modify it to conform with the known facts.
Be a good chap, and bring your claims (along with links, citations, etc.) to the Talk: page for discussion there.
Jay.