I was going to suggest this morning that someone else file this issue as a case with the Arbitration Committee so that the repeated slights to the character and integrity of various people can either be confirmed or formally and firmly rejected. Looks like Thatcher has done so already, and thank you Thatcher for that.
There is also a discussion at WT:CHECUSER about changing the policy to make disclosure of checks mandatory upon request. It seems like it'd be simpler (and far less bureaucratic) to implement an extension that notifies someone using the email function when they have been checked, by whom perhaps, and with the reason given. Assuming, of course, consensus forms that notification serves a useful purpose (I'm not sure it does).
~Nathan