Sheesh, some of the opposers are getting rough treatment on that proposal. Seems unnecessary, especially when there is a "discussion" section and the !vote sections are set apart to make the fact that they are being numbered clear.
On Jan 4, 2008 11:46 AM, Ned Scott ned@nedscott.com wrote:
Canvassing paranoia. Doc's motives aside, whatever they might be, such a message wouldn't even be effective in canvassing.
--Ned Scott
On Jan 4, 2008, at 7:40 AM, Ryan Postlethwaite wrote:
Doc, you've come here looking for opposes, simple as that. It was obvious by your tone that you were ABF and wanted people to pop along so you could get your own way. We weren't pulling a fast one in the slightest, we advertised it on the admin noticeboard,VP, the centralised discussion template - now I've done a watchlist notice just to make sure everyone see's it. Your ascertation that we were trying to pull a fast one is completely false and has no merit whatsoever - I said it on your talk page, running to the mailing list because you don't get your own way is quite frankly sad.
Ryan
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l