On 5/4/06, Ben McIlwain cydeweys@gmail.com wrote:
We cannot put up with these attempts at gaming our consensus-based system. Consensus doesn't work when it just becomes a numbers game of who can recruit the most votes. And trying to make a rational decision about the merits of an article when a bunch of sheeple are coming in mindlessly on both sides and voting without even considering the issues is absurd. We need to deal with this problem. We need to modify our policy so that it IS a blockable offense to vote-stack and game the system.
Way way way to subjective. RFC and arbcom would probably be a better option.
-- geni