geni wrote:
On 2/27/07, Marc Riddell michaeldavid86@comcast.net wrote:
on 2/26/07 10:24 PM, geni at geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Knocking out even 10 of the hyperactives would lead to serious problems unless you can find replacements (and if you can could you do so now? The backlogs are getting anoying again).
Are you saying that the quantity of the product is more important than the quality of the people? If so, that type of thinking is what has seriously contributed to the cancer in the culture.
I'm saying that if you want a situation where the maintenance side continues to remain in any way shape or form under control you cannot afford to follow any course that would result in the loss of the hyperactive admins.
This is simply a description of the current sitution.
How may "hyper-active" admins are there? And if I'm following things corrects (and maybe I'm not), it seems that you're assuming that these hyperactives are likely candidates for losing their admin status. Am I right about that?
-Rich