On [[Latymer Upper School]], one contributor has added, in relation to the school's new logo/shield:
"No approval was obtained from the [[College of Arms]] for this new shield, and it is, therefore, unauthorised by the [[Law of Arms]]."
I originally removed it from the article as needing a source, but replaced it after the contributor in question demonstrated to me on the talk page that he appears to know what he is talking about - certainly more than I know about heraldry.
However, is this original research? Or does it follow on naturally once the Law of Arms is understood? It appears to be a legal opinion, and I would imagine that any legal opinions should come from a citable source.
My main concern is that, even if it is true, it would need to be proved that approval was not in fact obtained, and that could be difficult to do. My instinct is to remove the statement from the article again pending this.