On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:00:49 +0530, "Relata Refero" refero.relata@gmail.com wrote:
I personally don't intend to follow the links back and try and analyse times of votes and blocks and who agreed with what and other such nonsense. But I dare say someone might. It might be obvious, or it might not. I would have thought that it would be best if the obsessive weren't given further reason to obsess.
They don't need any reason, they never did.
There are no secret courts. There is no erroneous ban. !! was unblocked after 75 minutes. It was a mistake, made out of excess of zeal.
Guy, you ignored the point I made earlier. There is a difference between this and IRC or arbcom-L. The difference is that you all already believe in Bigfoot, to quote the principle NYB suggested at the RfAr.
No, what we believe in is the stalking of Wikipedians - particularly those admins involved in banning certain users. We have very good evidence for this.
I do not believe in conspiracy theories or Bigfoot. I especially do not believe in conspiracy theories where I am supposed to be one of the conspirators. I am thinking of renaming the list grassy-knoll-l out of irony.
I do believe in ban-evading abusers of Wikipedia because I have blocked more of their sockpuppets than I can count.
Guy (JzG)