On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:36:19 +0100, Anthere anthere9@yahoo.com wrote:
Delirium a écrit:
Why would that be the right thing to do? The landing is merely one part if the mission---The [[Apollo 11]] page, by comparison, doesn't have one article on the trip *to* the moon, and a separate article on the moon landing. There's one article on the entire mission, trip and landing, and then separate articles on the equipment, like the lunar module.
You cannot compare I think. Unless I am wrong, the Apollo II main mission was to go on the moon. So, the craft, the mission and the equipement may be confused in one reference. Also, it was set only by only one country.
That's Apollo 11, not Apollo II. The mission after the initial lunar landing was Apollo 12, not Apollo III.
The situation is comparable to a notional Apollo mission where the lander was made by and crewed by Europeans.
In any case, well done, Americans and Europeans alike! Landing something on Titan and sending back sound and vision is an awesome feat. Of science, communication and co-operation.