The results are one sided. There is a mountain of evidence. Nobs is being railroaded, and Cberlet appears about to be given authority to cite himself whenever and wherever he might find an opinion, based on his "expert" status. I don't contest that he merits an article (altho it is a bit of a resume), but I do contest his neutrality and range of expertise. That, combined w the mountains of evidence against him and the conflict he has fostered (5 people he rounded up and shoved together just in this one case!) should provide all the proof you need of the difficulty he presents.
Sam Spade
On 12/4/05, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
From what I can see, the arbitrators are doing quite well with a difficult case.
-Matt _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l