Indeed.
Just currently thinking of the huge number of hours I spent on the 168 case.
How sad.
Ant
Patrick Aiden Hunt a écrit:
Well, they do have the choice of just leaving Wikipedia... which is how I saw numerous decisions ended... that's what I was referring to...
-Skyler
-----Original Message----- From: Anthere [mailto:anthere9@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 7:46 PM
Patrick Aiden Hunt a écrit:
Thinking about it logically, community service does seem like a viable option. However, the way it was originally said to be applied was not.
If a person were willing to go through the whole arbitration process until ruling, I would say there is a good chance they actually do
enjoy
Wikipedia and may have some value to the greater good. Perhaps in the future ArbCom can be given the option of giving community service in exchange for a lighter sentence.
Errrr. I think you are making a mistake on a point Patrick. Those who go through the whole arbitration process are not necessarily willing... I would even dare saying they usually are not.
They just do not have any choice.
For all other points about reducing sentence through good behavior (community work showing efforts), I absolutely agree with you.