Haukur Þorgeirsson wrote:
No matter how many people you can convince that listing Article X under [[Category:Pseudoscience]] does /not/ mean that Wikipedia takes the stance that Topic X is a pseudoscience, the vast majority will assume that it does.
And that is why people are complaining about those categorisations.
[snip]
Maybe the only way out of this is to call the categories something unwieldy-but-NPOV like [[Category:Theories or beliefs widely considered pseudoscience]]...
Once again. Do you object to [[Holocaust denial]] being in the [[Pseudohistory]] category? Would you prefer to have something "NPOV" like [[Category:Theories or beliefs widely considered pseudohistory]]?
Yes. Some neutral title like [[Category:Non-mainstream historical claims]] or [[Category:Non-mainstream historical theories]] would be much better.
Although on a larger level, I'm not convinced using any of these labels is superior to not using them at all. Is [[Atlantis]] under [[Category:Pseudohistory]]? What about [[The Bible]]?
-Mark