In a message dated 3/5/2008 1:36:01 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, toddmallen@gmail.com writes:
unnecessary and decorative since the article does not (and should not) discuss it, since it's just decoration for the company/book/album in and of itself and is not discussed by sources. It is not, in most cases, a necessary part of an article on the (corporation|album|book|movie|video game|what have you). We should only provide exceptions for nonfree images where they're -needed-, >>
-------------- Sure, change "needed" to "discussed in sources". Needed is a value judgement that we should not be making, and it's a war-starter. If a source discusses the "rampant sexuality exhibited by the latest album cover..." then we can and should include that same cover under fair-use to illustrate the point. Agree?
Will Johnson
**************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001)