On Oct 10, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Phil Sandifer wrote:
But as long as there's such serious doubt over our definition of WP:RS, we have to recognize that WP:V is, while necessary, also not currently in a functional form.
I respectfully disagree. [[WP:V]] can stand alone and it is functional with or without the help of [[WP:RS]]
-- Jossi