Samuel Meyer wrote:
According to policy, any good faith-effort to improve the encylcopedia is not considered vandalism.
Yes, but unfortunately good-faith edits aren't automatically marked as such, you see. You've removed stuff, without an edit summary, and I'm sure you'll understand how this can very easily be interpreted as vandalism.
Edits were made to delete information that was unsubstantiated and that was dismissive of these views without warrant.
You can move unsubstantiated information to the Talk page and request a source. Ideally, people putting the information back in should provide a source for it. If they just put it back without a source, contact them on their User talk page to talk it over.
Timwi