Generally, "being right" is not a defense to NOR. NOR helps to preserve relevance and importance of information as well as correctness of it. If no one else has seen fit to investigate this matter or publish that conclusion, why should we be the first? If the guy's that concerned, tell him to suggest the story to a newspaper. If the paper decides it's correct and important enough to publish, there's the source!
Seraphimblade
On 4/2/07, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 12:48:52 +0100, "Andrew Gray" shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
Glancing at the talkpage - if it was an authorised design it would be published in X; it's not published in X; ergo unauthorised.
Proof of a negative, of course.
I tagged it as needing a citation. We should probably be fine as long as we restrict ourselves to what is said in reliable secondary sources.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l