On 09/03/2008, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
This fails to address the case where the jawdropping lack of good judgement is the actual problem with the nominations, and that poisons AFD in general.
Not seeing a lack of good judgment. Just seeing people using a different set of auxiliary assumptions.
Pretending the actual problem isn't a problem is not really an option any more.
But it isn't really a problem. If you wish to have a certain set of axioms used in AFD debate you have to justify them.