I think bureaucrats should disregard stupid oppose votes when deciding consensus and should say so.
Theresa
On 6/15/06, Matt R matt_crypto@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 6/15/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
Just when you think you've seen it all...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Herostratus
One editor opposes adminship on the grounds that Herostratus has some nicely executed fake "categories" on his user page:
We need to enforce sane rationales for votes on RfA ... somehow. Particularly for oppose votes, since they carry much more weight. Failing that, perhaps we should start a Wiki society that, for every oppose vote judged to be idiotic, automatically mass votes in favour of the candidate.
And I'm only half-joking ;-)
-- Matt [[User:Matt Crypto]]
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l