On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 16:54:33 +0100, Timwi timwi@gmx.net wrote:
Matthew Trump wrote: It seemed highly desirableto me to create separate categories, for images only, so that we don't have "mixed" categories of both articles and images, which would be quite ugly and not very useful at all.
Could you explain what would be ugly and useless? The conceptual reduction of using the same term to describe both images and articles, or the results of a mixed-source presentation of category contents, or?
There are distinct interface and metadata issues here. I'm not sure that it is necessary to have two different conceptual cats for maps (articles) and maps (images), if you mean the same kind of maps.
Cat display /should/ distinguish source types; articles, images, and {other media} can be shown separately for each group without further metadata, leveraging existing namespaces.
+sj+