On 6/25/06, Zero megamanzero521@yahoo.com wrote:
To whom's decision...? It is censorship. It thrives upon the ideal of a person perhaps not engaging in the action by merit of another group selectively in the belief they think it might be "cover-worthy", which is never the case in any encyclopedia.
How on earth is it censorship? No information is removed from the article.
If information is there, but someone choses not to read it, as they want to "be suprised" by the piece of fiction or film or whatever, that is them using their own judgement. Not anyone imposing censorship on them from outside.
All the Spoilers warnings are is a warning flag. Calling them censorship is callous abuse of the english language.