On 3/14/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
The Cunctator wrote:
On 3/13/06, Philip Welch wikipedia@philwelch.net wrote:
On Mar 13, 2006, at 5:51 PM, The Cunctator wrote:
The argument hinges upon the assumptions such as that it's important to Wikipedia to a) encourage 1st-time editing or b) creating different classes of users is a long-term bad thing.
I guess we shouldn't have admins if we accept (b).
Right!
Or at least, we should all feel very guilty about it.
Since you seem to be the chief Anarchist, shouldn't you resign your adminship immediately as an example? :)
Undermineing the system from within has a long history. On a more serious note the more admins we have who view themselves as little different to ordinary members the better.
-- geni