Do you guys realize that the articles published in The Register are not mere "nonsense" (as the Wikipedia spokesperson claims), and appear quite well-researched and in-depth to the readers?
The second bit of that may be true (there are a lot of idiots in the world), but the first part simply isn't. The Register is full of nonsense. I once responded to one of their articles on Wikipedia and they basically picked individual words from my comment and put them together (with lots of "..." inbetween) to make it seem that I'd said something very different to what I actually said. That is *not* reputable journalism.