Vicki Rosenzweig vr@redbird.org wrote:At 12:48 AM 8/16/03 -0700, you wrote:
Rick wrote:
Steve Vertigo wrote:
I think we ought to list each of the recall candidates, and invite their staffs to add to their articles.
Crazy? :)
http://www.sfgate.com/gate/special/pages/2003/recall/ http://www.georgyforgov.com/index.htm ! ! go geeks!
I strongly disagree. How could they possibly give us NPOV articles?
The NPOV requirement does not make them inelligible as subjets. Obviously, if any of the 135 dodn't have a POV he or she would not be running for office. :-) NPOV editing involves fairly representing what each of these candidates is about. After saying this is whate the candidate stands for, NPOV does not required that we have to dig up the opposing point of view.
Also, I suspect that a lot of them would provide NPOV autobiographical information: "Jo Candidate was born in $city on $date, educated at $college, and sold ice cream door-to-door before becoming a $professional."