Lord Voldemort wrote:
On 5/30/06, Raphael Wegmann raphael@psi.co.at wrote:
<snip> > Yes, critique on religions should be included in Wikipedia, > but WP:NPOV does not mean to call those who disagree vandals > and block them, if they deem the "critique" a respectless > insult and remove it. This is what I was refering to, when > I wrote "foreign faiths or cultures aren't welcome".
You say "critique on religions should be included in Wikipedia", then immediately afterwards say those people that remove it should not be called vandals. Removal of appropriate material is considered vandalism, and repeatedly doing so may result in a block. Do you not think it should be so? I don't really want to get into *this* specific debate, I was just a little confused about what you wrote. Thanks.
There's a difference between fair, accurate and reasonable critique and stereotyped hostility. The former should be included, the latter should be removed. It's not always easy to differenciate between the two, but you can easily see, that it's the latter, if it is itself not subject to critique respectively if people who disagree are blocked before even discussing their issues:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag... http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag...