You really shouldn't pretend that your opinion is an incontrovertible fact.
On 6/20/07, Brock Weller brock.weller@gmail.com wrote:
The first one made us look silly and the second one made us encyclopedic? My earlier post sums this up fairly well.
On 6/20/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Anthony wrote:
[[Wikipedia_talk:Spoiler]]
Is it really fair to delete 45000 spoiler warnings and claim that the
failure to
undelete them is "consensus"? (Especially when it turns out there
actually
were hundreds restored, but they kept getting deleted anyway)
No, absolutely not, just as it isn't fair to add 45000 spoiler warnings and claim that the failure to delete them is "consensus".
The spoiler warnings were added individually, by people creating articles and specifically deciding where a spoiler warning goes in that article. The spoiler warnings were deleted en masse by one or two people using automation software without reading the articles they were in.
You don't see any difference between these two activities?
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- -Brock _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l