On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
I essentially agree, but it is less about non-homeopathists than about anti-homeopathists. Some of us who may have nothing to do with the practice are nevertheless respectfull of those who do. NPOV is maintained by *fairly* representing the views of homeopathists, and briefly recognizing the premises under which a large number of people reject the practice. It does not require repetitive rejection of detail. That just makes for tedious reading. It is not for us to judge the validity of homeopathy, but to provide verifiability for both sides of the conflict.
Excellently put, Ray. To put the last point another way, our aim is to give a general outline of the current debate on a subject (if the phrase "teach the conflict" hadn't been appropriated for other purposes these days, it would be a good description).