When it comes to censorship and Wikipedia, there are a few things to remember:
I feel very depressed. Very. No, I really mean *very*. To a certain point, a nudity picture censored, I care little. Far worse is censorship on points I can't even begin to understand. Some time ago, the french wikipedia was censoring articles under the reason the term didnot existed (for exemple, racialisme), then it censored article under the reason the content added could be liable by the french law, and today, it is censoring an article because it is reporting french law condemned someone for doing illegal actions and explain the reason why it was considered illegal by french law.
For those understanding french, the censored part is there
http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Jos%E9_Bov%E9&diff=47546&...
Honest, I do not get it.
You would not believe it, there was even a comparison with the article on [[Adolph Hitler]]. What is that law's name already ? I fail to see the comparison between Adolph Hitler and Jos� Bov� :-(((
Hmmmm...the english wiki is willing to report law condemnation and to censor erotic picture. The french wiki is censoring law condemnation explanation, but keeping erotic picture.
Look...maybe...merging articles, we could happen to do something proper ?
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com