On 13/08/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 8/13/07, Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on what you mean by consensus, of course.
By any realistic meaning of consensus, none has been established. Point me to a discussion that you believe established a consensus for the change in policy you are suggesting.
I've heard consensus defined as a majority, and a majority of the people who commented on AB's RfA, knowing that AB edited through Tor, suggested that AB should be an admin.
I said "realistic meaning". "consensus==majority" is not realistic. I've seen "rough consensus" defined as "supermajority" (which is, for the most part, the definition used on RfA), but that's as close to your definition as I've seen.