* A. Nony Mouse wrote:
Excuse me while I have a good laugh. You've been trying to drive people like me, who honestly want wikipedia reformed, onto wikipediareview (so that you can say "oh it's just whining from wikipediareview, we should destroy them") for months now.
As none of that sounds remotely familiar I'll assume you are using some sort of collective form of "you".
I'm just going to sit back and eat some popcorn and enjoy watching them make fun of YOU now, Conrad, because that's all they're doing.
That's ok. I'm a big boy. I can take it.
You've raised valid points just as I did, and they're not taking you seriously, just reiterating the same old Judge Dredd "I AM THE LAW" bullshit.
Bizarrely enough, >I< am also 'the law'... making these generalizations perhaps somewhat simplistic. Wikipedia and its administration are made up of a wide variety of people with different backgrounds and viewpoints. Thus, attacking the institution or members/admins in general based on the actions of individuals will always include an element of unjustified criticism. Deal with individual problems rather than trashing the whole.