On 11/10/06, bksimonb simon@bkinfo.net wrote:
I tried reasoning with the main editor but as I, and others who have tried, have found that the guy acts like a tyrant and won't budge an inch. Even to the extent of reverting NPOV warnings.
I haven't looked at the article in question but reverting NPOV warnings can be justified if the article is already seemingly NPOV.
What do you suggest is wrong with the article as it stands?