On May 29, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Nick Boalch wrote:
I see no problem with requiring them to be reaffirmed every 2 years or so. If they are unpleasant that is reason enough not to reaffirm them.
I oppose this... since becoming an admin a few months ago, my user page has been vandalized 98 times by those users that I have blocked for disruption and vandalism, or those that believed that a page protection or closing an AfD against their POV were admin abuse . All I need is 98 "against" votes on such reaffirmation.
The peer review process that can be initiated by posting a complaint at WP:ANI, or as a last resort presented to de ArbCom, is sufficient recourse for those that have a complaint against an administrator.
-- Jossi