Here's a question which has been (to my mind, at least) raised by the recent Fleshlight debate...
...should Wikipedia keep articles which the community is unwilling to maintain?
I haven't checked that article's history, so I don't know if it was in that class or not, but examples certainly exist. There's plenty of articles which are festering cesspits, one or two pathological editors warring over them, and no-one trying (or caring) to "make it good". Many of these, if taken to AFD, will survive with a "notable topic, keep, cleanup", and the situation will return to the status-quo, with the vague possibility that One Day a good and hard-working editor will come along and adopt it.
Is this sort of thing a net gain or a net loss for the encyclopedia? Thoughts appreciated.