So isn't it better to cite stuff to avoid it getting questioned. It also helps avoid stuff getting deleted. If something isn't verified and I can't find the info to back it up, I tend to go for deletion discussions. If people bother to verify beforehand you get a reliable wikipedia with a lot less after-the-fact work.
Mgm
On 8/29/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 8/29/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
It would be useful if someone could translate some of this for those of us who do not read russian.
as far as I can figure out from machine translations the policy has recently been translated from English and they are now trying to get community approval. Most of the opposition appears to be from those who think it is over ridged and that cites should only need to be provided in cases where something has been challanged.
-- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l