Yes. Nathan is right that the better strategy is to defend the existing articles, and so establish that such articles should remain on wikipedia. A more widespread intelligent selective good-faith participation in afds is the ordinary wikipedians defense against cabals. And the best of all is to improve existing articles so people will be ashamed even to nominate them--or if they still do, we will establish a solid pattern of snow keep closes.
On 12/29/07, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
Well, speaking as devil's advocate - what you're really saying is that they should be recreated. And perhaps before taking the step of recreation, it should established that these articles ought to exist in the first place.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l