On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 11:17:32 +0200, "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
I've also suggested that one or two people should take it upon themselves to really study the candidate over several days, going through their entire history and producing a short report, which other people can base their votes on. Rather than the current system where each person independently supposedly checks the history, and probably votes based on the first 3 edits they see.
This has definite merit. More like a RFAr - initial fact finding, then voting. I'd vote for that if polls weren't evil ;-)
Guy (JzG)