On 4/14/08, Relata Refero refero.relata@gmail.com wrote:
More generally, viewing each of our three original foundational policies individually is a mistake, which is why the last three mega-threads have been more heat than light. Understanding NPOV by itself is absurd, it needs V; V left to itself sounds dangerous, it needs NOR. And so on.
Yes, but we don't have a talk page for addressing fundamental inaccuracies and flaws that have crept into our entire policy apparatus. Which is why I'm left holding two parallel discussions on WP:V and WP:NOR when, really, what I need is a discussion about why Wikipedia needs to shape up and be more postmodern from which changes to both pages (and NPOV) can be edited according to consensus.:)
-Phil