Nicholas Knight wrote
You're falling into the classic "sympathy" trap, but I'm going to drop it and just say that I still fail to see why this is *any* different from any other Wikipedia article, especially on a contentious subject.
It certainly shouldn't be. If we take 'diagnosis' to mean diagnosis by a clinical psychologist on the basis of an adequate history and personal contact, and if we assume these diagnoses are subject to the usual clinical confidentiality, and become public only if the subject self-identifies to a large extent, it becomes a short enough list.
I see that top of the list is a case where AS is being used as a legal defence. That would raise other questions.
Charles