Stan Shebs wrote:
Timwi wrote:
K Forstner wrote:
I agree wholeheartedly with what Jakob says (although it seems many people don't like the idea of someone rejecting their new toy). Maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Writers , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Melbourne_trams or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Viennese_composers can serve as eye-openers: In each case, the "category" itself is rather pointless, and the entries are dubious. What is more, no one seems to be discussing this anywhere.
How old is the category feature? About a few months?
Heh, I think it's just three weeks old as of today. As features go, categories have been adopted remarkably rapidly - just compare tables and images, most of which are still in the old formats.
For sure! Considering that the debate about whether or not to have categories lasted for a year. During that time there was very little in that discussion about how the categories would be chosen. So even if many of these categories are different from the ones that I would use, the system as a whole is on track.
Ec