Mark Wagner wrote:
On 11/8/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/8/06, Gregory Kohs thekohser@gmail.com wrote:
I know that her edit was a trifling one, but considering all of the heat and light that's been generated in recent months about conflicts of interest, why is it that Beesley's account doesn't receive so much as a warning,
Now, what kind of "warning" do you consider appropriate? NPOV0 [1]? Welcomeenpov [2]?
Or perhaps you'd advocate some kind of hand-written warning?
Whatever you consider the appropriate warning to give, your comment is symptomatic of the terrible notion that giving a warning is a punishment of some kind and should be doled out to any editor who misbehaves somehow.
Handwritten, always. The warning templates are almost uniformly based around the assumption that a warning is a punishment, rather than an attempt to get someone to change their behavior.
Hmmm. Such warnings should only be issued by people with good penmanship.
Ec