On 11/1/05, Bryan Derksen bryan.derksen@shaw.ca wrote:
It would depend on the circumstances of the conflict, wouldn't it? In cases where there's genuine debate going on, it doesn't make sense to arbitrarily cut it off at some deadline rather than letting it continue until a clear decision is reached. If it stalemates then perhaps a deadline can come into play but it shouldn't be required as a universal solution.
Stalemate is a subjective judement.
"Conflict" is not inherently bad, it's part of how disagreements can be resolved.
Heated conflict is.
-- geni