MacGyverMagic/Mgm wrote:
It is standard to delete recreations which are exact copies or very near copies of previously deleted material. If that's not the case ask for undeletion at WP:DRV and tell it was wrongfully deleted as a recreation, because it is not sufficiently similar.
Oy, another abbreviation to remember. This profusion of WP:TLA redirects may make it easier to link to pages but they certainly don't make it easier to understand what's being talked about.
In the case of [[The Jar]], I just went ahead and undeleted the article and added an external link, as well as mentioning on talk: why I thought the reason given for its deletion was invalid. That seemed to work, but a short while later some editors came along who expanded the article greatly so it may not be the best counterexample since it may have simply gone unnoticed until then.