Ray Saintonge wrote:
Nicholas Knight wrote:
Fred Bauder wrote:
There is a middle ground that satisfies the great majority of the Earth's population. An extreme "left" position that insists on videos of intercourse
I'm rather extreme left-wing with all that entails relative to the vast majority of the Earth's and Wikipedia's population, and you certainly don't see me insisting on any such thing.
I'll defend its right to exist with my life if absolutely neccessary, but I'm certainly not going to insist that it either exist or be placed on Wikipedia.
Some people will go overboard by allocating everything along a left-right spectrum. This puts Fred in the uncharacteristic position of suggesting that the extreme left supports extreme freedom. I would suggest that if either Hitler or Stalin were the one deciding about the status of the autofellation picture on Wikipedia, he would have insisted that it is immoral and not tolerated it at all.
That's not a "left" thing, anyway. With all the leftists running around calling libertarians "right wing extremists", it should be fairly obvious that supporting the right to distribute pictures of autofellation isn't left-wing since that's pretty well libertarian canonical opinion. That aside, though . . .
I've been deleting large sections of this series of threads without reading them, because I've had to do some actual work and would never get caught up if I read them all. Has there been any significant progress on the idea of developing code that will create an opt-in/opt-out solution to the problem of inlining controversial images?
-- Chad