steven l. rubenstein said:
steven l. rubenstein said:
"Tony Sidaway" minorityreport@bluebottle.com
Quality of source is usually (but not always) POV. We're supposed to be writing NPOV articles. A caveat such as "warning: the article relies on population projections that were proven by events to be grossly in error" is fine and NPOV. A caveat such as "the claims at this site are patently incorrect" is POV and superfluous. Otherwise rely on the general site content disclaimer and the reader's commonsense.
I believe this misrepresents our policy.
Could you be more specific?
I'm afraid you will have to read my entire e-mail, and not just the first sentence.
Take it as read that I did. In what way did I misrepresent the policy?