On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:51:29 +0000, "David Gerard" dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
The naming (not even linking) of antisocialmedia.net was suppressed per WP:NPA - a community rule being applied to article space. Don't be obtuse.
Well, now, I thought that editorial consensus pretty rapidly formed for mentioning but not linking. Is my memory at fault here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites...
The first mention of "suppression" in the evidence for hat case comes from Dan, stating that it was "suppressed" from ANI (where it should indeed not have been linked, as a vile and baseless attack and campaign of harassment against several people: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Attack_sites...
The Evidence page does not, at a quick re-scan, mention removal of any *mention* of the name form the Bagley article, and I would expect such a removal to last about as long as the good faith but misguided removal of the links to michaelmoore.com and donmurphy.net.
Guy (JzG)