So, what are you saying, that you disagree with the arb com decision? If so, hey, I do too, but as long as people are getting desysopped for restoring controversial out-of-process speedy deletions I think you're going to have a tough time convincing admins to do so without a deletion review.
Just as there is a difference between reverting an edit to an article and edit warring, there is a difference between undeleting an article that's just been deleted and wheel warring. From my memory of the arbcom decision, only admins which deleted or undeleted more than once were desysoped.