On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 14:30:14 -0800, Luna lunasantin@gmail.com wrote:
By preliminary looks through page histories, it looks like he *was* being pretty disruptive and edit warring, with a persistent failure to use talk pages -- but then, he wasn't the only one doing so. The full protection of the page seems more or less appropriate, as a means of forcing discussion.
I got the same result, but I don't see the block log as evidence of a cabal, I regard William pretty highly, for example.
This has all the appearances of someone bringing their battles to Wikipedia.
Guy (JzG)