JAY JG wrote:
From: Timwi timwi@gmx.net
You are asserting that "what we have now works fine" even though I have already mentioned numerous times why I think it does *not* work fine. I have provided what I think is a compelling reason to change in the first place.
Your argument boils down to this; it's not working fine because I think the bar is set too high.
Not quite. I don't just "think the bar is set too high". I think that there are many people who should be admins, but aren't BECAUSE the bar is set too high. The high bar is the cause of the problem; the resultant problem is having good folks not be admins.
and we have rather few good admins as a result (500 out of 25500, less than 2%).
Ah, but how many regularly active editors? Probably no more than 1000.
Ah, but how many regularly active admins? Probably no more than 20.
Timwi