David, I see no reason not to put {{Cite Sources}} on the article itself. There's no point in putting it on the Talk page because it's not the Talk page that needs the references. ;-) Like the neutrality tag, it's a warning to the reader, in this case that the article has not been properly sourced. I think either that one or your {{unreferenced}} tag would be a good thing to use on some articles. Yes, I can think of quite a few. ;-)
Sarah
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:06:13 +1100, David Gerard fun@thingy.apana.org.au wrote:
David Gerard (fun@thingy.apana.org.au) [050128 21:24]: If you look at [[Tamplate talk:Cite sources]], you will see considerable debate about {{Cite sources}} - and people asserting it should *only* go on the talk page.
I was thinking of {{unreferenced}} as an article-space tag, to encourage creators to add their sources and suggest to those wanting to raise Wikipedia's quality another good thing to work on.
(Did I mention I'm a big fan of the de: quality drive?)
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l