First off, I'd like to start by apologizing for my indulgence here, and asking anyone on the list who wants serious discussion to please pass over this email. I'm also replying to multiple Julie messages in one email for your skipping convenience.
Julie, I'm sending this to you separately just in case you've already unsubscribed from the list.
On May 5, 2006, at 3:45 PM, julieharding1@charter.net julieharding1@charter.net wrote:
You guys are hilarious! Did you know that all of the emails that have been coming to me today, I've been editing?
Should be, "Did you know that I've been editing all of the emails that have been coming to me today?"
All of you intelligent men spell like you're in the third grade. If there are other women in here, don't tolerate thier behavior!
"Their".
Putting up with boobs? Many of you men are probably so fat from sitting around that you have your own boobs to contend with, so leave ours alone. And I'm here to testify that a man's crotch is a lot like a nuclear reactor. Bump it up against anything, and it's ready to go!
Actually, bumping a nuclear reactor doesn't really do much. Also, I think you missed the double meaning: "boob" also means "a foolish or stupid person".
Now calm down boys. Without titties in the world, you wouldn't be here. -Julie
I don't think you need to worry about men not appreciating breasts.
On May 5, 2006, at 12:31 PM, julieharding1@charter.net julieharding1@charter.net wrote:
Hello Steve, I'll have to consider that now after the full head on attack I received last night. Is this your guys' way of testing someone to find out if they have enough proxy to be on your team of editors?
Um, I don't think that's what "proxy" means.
Because if your team of editors work together every night accusing each other of being on crack or being insane, then I don't want anthing to do with it.
"Anything".
There is a whole world wide web out there that can appreciate my intelligence and time more than you all did last night. Yet if you want to be my friend, and you will respect me for what I can help you with, then tell me where to go and maybe I'll see you there in a couple of days. God Bless
-Julie
On May 5, 2006, at 8:39 PM, julieharding1@charter.net julieharding1@charter.net wrote:
I just spent all day editing a whole section for you Guy. Your system would not save it for me. It had to have been at least six hours. God, I'm tired. Why did I do it? My love for English and writing and boy were there a lot of mistakes! Yet, se la vi.
"C'est la vie".
Snowspinner apologized, so I don't have to report him for cyber- abuse. Your cite is filled with it though. Today, I was referred to as: "Boobs." You are going to lose a lot of very talented people at the rate you're going. P.S. The attachment is just a Goodbye picture of me. Maybe if you try, you can find and save the whole section I edited today.
On May 5, 2006, at 3:56 PM, julieharding1@charter.net julieharding1@charter.net wrote:
You are kidding aren't you? You are using Pokemon as a metaphor right? Please tell me that Pokemon is not a subject in Wikipedia. No Phil, you're just being a jerk and screwing with my head again. Knock it off. And if Pokemon really is in there, then it's your idiocy. -Boobs
Yeah, we do cover pop culture. Clever move signing your email "Boobs", though.
On May 5, 2006, at 4:10 PM, julieharding1@charter.net julieharding1@charter.net wrote:
Geni, How can we convince Guy that it is necessary to visually recognize the troublemakers and then block them from Wikipedia? Dispute resolution? I'm spending two thirds of my time trying to get troublemakers to leave me alone. Then, very rarely, a serious posting reaches me and I can respond. This is rediculous!
"Ridiculous".
Last night I got accused of being on crack, I was accused of being insane, and today I was referred to as a "Boob." Yet obviously my opinion must count for something because my e-box is full. -Julie