Lainaus Tim Starling ts4294967296@hotmail.com:
After coming across [[reciprocal system of theory]] for the first time just recently, and after personally spending a great deal of time on [[neutrosophy]] and other articles, I have a feeling we're losing the war on pseudoscience, mainly due to an insufficient number of motivated skeptical contributors. I've been giving serious thought to advertising our cause on the major skeptical community forums.
I don't really see any other way to do this, other than plain old-fashioned manpower. If any of these theories are truly idiosyncratic, we'll be able to save a lot of time if we can get them deleted. Other than that, we've just got to do the research, present the flaws, and contextualise.
-- Tim Starling <tstarlingphysicsunimelbeduau>
I wouldn't be too disheartened. Remember that on wikipedia nonsense has to eternally keep glancing over it's shoulders. Eventually someone will notice it, and the heuristic of the system vastly favors sense over nonsense. Nonsense we will always have with us, but that is what being open means. The only nonsense that is secure is nonsense that is the current scientific paradigm. And such nonsense always exists as well. It is the task of scientists, not us encyclopedists to deal with that.
-- Cimon Avaro on a pogostick
P.S. This is my first post on the mailing-list. May it reach you all safely.