In a message dated 3/4/2007 2:31:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, guy.chapman@spamcop.net writes:
All of which is, as you have been told numerous times, COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT because when YOU write about it YOU have a conflict of interest. Is that so very hard to understand? That is not a judgment on the merit of your organisation, it's about the appropriateness of YOU adding links to it and YOU adding content about it.
And that, I think, had better be my last word on the subject, at least on this list.
Anyone who takes it properly can see the how you don't cite Wikipedia policy properly. Besides your shouting, you say I can't write about a topic that interests me because of an inappropriate claim of a conflict of interest. It's worse than telling someone he can't write in a Wikipedia entry about him because it's not an autobiography. It's like saying a father who has lost a son to a drunk driver can't talk about drunk driving on Wikipedia.
I feel attacked here. I can't block and don't have a clear view on how to involve WP:Arbitration but want help with it. I want help in the situation as I have been unfairly treated, blocked unfairly, and an article I care about has been vandalized by Wikipedia definitions as a result of ignorance.
Vincent UN:John Wallace Rich <BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.